What does the architecture look like after the migration?
In classic WordPress everything is one system: the CMS, the frontend, PHP, the database, plugins and hosting. Each element affects the others - which is why a plugin update can break the layout, and a database problem takes down the whole site.
After the migration these layers are separated. Content lives in a CMS (your current one or a new one such as Sanity or Payload), the frontend is Astro components in a repository, and everything is served from Cloudflare infrastructure. The CMS stays convenient for marketing, and the frontend is no longer dependent on it.
In practice this means two possible variants: WordPress stays as a headless CMS and delivers content through an API, or - if its limits really get in the way - we migrate the content to a modern headless CMS. We make that decision together, after the audit.
What affects the scope and the quote?
Every migration is different, so we do not work from made-up price lists. The scope depends primarily on the number of page types, the amount of content and CMS entries, the number of languages, and the integrations and forms that need to be moved.
It also matters whether the design stays as it is or gets refreshed along the way, and which CMS we choose as the target.
After the audit we prepare a concrete scope, risks, recommended architecture, timeline and quote. Only then do you decide whether to start the project.
What happens after launch?
The migration does not end on DNS switch day. For the first weeks we monitor indexing, 404 errors and Core Web Vitals to make sure Google has correctly picked up the new version.
Further development happens in a controlled process: changes go through the repository, code review and staging, and deployments are automated and reversible.
